YES! I'm just not sure everyone could agree on that as URL extension. The
reasoning behind making it something other than an HREF is that
functionally its a different operation. An HREF points you to the resource.
This is different in that it points you to a surrogate for the resource
which implies a different set of operations.
> > But this has the problem that the author of a document has no control over
> > the meta information associated with the document. Having meta information
> > specified in
> > the HEAD as an associated LINK'ed resource would seem to be the correct
> > way to do this.
> >
>
> This is not of any use for non-HTML documents though. How would you
> provide meta information about a GIF file? On the other hand
>
> http://hopf.math.nwu.edu/logo.gif;info
>
> works fine.
Good point.
-MM
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Life is a game. Someone wins and someone loses. Get used to it. <BR> <HR><A HREF="http://www.gatech.edu/michael.html">Michael Mealling</A>