Why can't new standards use 4-digit years? Is character-for-character
compliance with outdated standards really necessary? Why is there a
reluctance to move away from 2-digit years?
(personally, I'd even go a step further than that and use ISO dates
like 1994-03-10, but that's not quite as human friendly, but great for
rik (depressed person trying to do automated searching/sorting, etc).
-- Rik Harris - email@example.com || Systems Programmer +61 3 560-3265 (AH) +61 3 90-53227 (BH) || and Administrator Fac. of Computing & Info.Tech., Monash Uni, Australia || Vic. Institute of http://www.vifp.monash.edu.au/people/rik.html || Forensic Pathology