Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!yale!husc6!harvard!lownlab!kiely
From: ki...@lownlab.UUCP (James P. Kiely)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: 2.9BSD
Message-ID: <331@lownlab.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 15-Jan-87 11:40:15 EST
Article-I.D.: lownlab.331
Posted: Thu Jan 15 11:40:15 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 16-Jan-87 01:45:30 EST
Lines: 10
What is the present status of 2.9BSD?
Is it being updated by Berkeley?
Will there ever be a 2.10 or 3.0?
Is there a version of 2.9BSD that supports ethernet?
Would it be worth it for me to port 4.3BSD utilities to 2.9BSD?
--
NAME: James P. Kiely USPS: Kiely Laboratories
USENET: ...!harvard!lownlab!kiely P.O. Box 624
PHONE: +1 617 782 4136 Allston, MA 02134-0624
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!keith
From: ke...@seismo.CSS.GOV (Keith Bostic)
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.2bsd,comp.unix.questions
Subject: 2.9BSD
Message-ID: <43085@beno.seismo.CSS.GOV>
Date: Thu, 29-Jan-87 00:13:12 EST
Article-I.D.: beno.43085
Posted: Thu Jan 29 00:13:12 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 1-Feb-87 02:57:31 EST
Sender: r...@seismo.CSS.GOV
Organization: Center for Seismic Studies, Arlington, VA
Lines: 40
Keywords: 2.9BSD, PDP 11's
> What is the present status of 2.9BSD?
> Is it being updated by Berkeley?
> Will there ever be a 2.10 or 3.0?
> Is there a version of 2.9BSD that supports ethernet?
> Would it be worth it for me to port 4.3BSD utilities to 2.9BSD?
Ah, yes, the technology that would not die... it's kind of heart-warming,
isn't it? I prefer to think of it as job security myself. (If you didn't
know, DEC just released a brand new machine in the PDP-11 line, the 11/53,
this fall.)
2.9BSD is currently being worked on. A few months ago, Casey Leedom and
I locked ourselves in a large closet and made, shall we say, rather major
changes. There will be a 2.10BSD. (We couldn't call it 3.0, there was
a BSD VAX release with that number. We wanted to call it System 6, but
some people didn't find that funny at all.)
In any case, I plan to have beta tapes on several machines around the end
of February and I'm hoping for a widespread distribution during March and
April. 2.10 is a faster, solider system than 2.9. It will contain 4.3's
ioctls, tty drivers, dz, dh, and dhu drivers, all of the 4.3 non-networking
system calls (with the exception of readv and writev), all of the 4.3
applications that were reasonably portable and many other things.
It will also contain support for the new machines, i.e. the 73, 84, etc,
and may support the PROs.
It is currently unclear what level of networking support it will have;
Although I have not made any effort to move 4.3 networking into place,
yet, at least two other sites have, and I hope to install some version
of their networking. At a minimum, it will have the 4.1a/b/c support it
had before.
If you have any specific questions and/or comments, please contact me
directly. I will be posting more information in comp.bugs.2bsd as the
distribution details firm up.
Keith Bostic
ke...@okeeffe.berkeley.edu
ucbvax!keith
(415) 642-8524
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!bostic
From: bos...@ucbvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.2bsd,comp.unix.questions
Subject: 2.9BSD
Message-ID: <17144@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Sat, 31-Jan-87 14:20:11 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.17144
Posted: Sat Jan 31 14:20:11 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 1-Feb-87 00:05:26 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 42
Keywords: 2.9BSD, PDP-11, distribution
This posting is in response to a recent posting in comp.unix.questions
regarding 2.9BSD and its future.
> What is the present status of 2.9BSD?
> Is it being updated by Berkeley?
> Will there ever be a 2.10 or 3.0?
> Is there a version of 2.9BSD that supports ethernet?
> Would it be worth it for me to port 4.3BSD utilities to 2.9BSD?
Yes, the technology that would not die... it's kind of heart-warming, isn't
it? I prefer to think of it as job security myself. (If you didn't know,
DEC just released a brand new machine in the PDP-11 line, the 11/53, this
fall.)
2.9BSD is currently being worked on. A few months ago, Casey Leedom and
I locked ourselves in a large closet and made, shall we say, rather major
changes. There will be a 2.10BSD. (We couldn't call it 3.0, there was
a BSD VAX release with that designation. We wanted to call it System 6,
but some people didn't find that funny at all.)
In any case, I plan to have beta tapes on several machines around the end
of February and I'm hoping for a widespread distribution during March and
April. 2.10 is a faster, solider system than 2.9. It will contain 4.3's
ioctls, tty drivers, dz, dh, and dhu drivers, all of the 4.3 non-networking
system calls (with the exception of readv, writev and quotas), all of the
4.3 applications that are reasonably portable and many other things. It
will also contain support for the new machines, i.e. the 73, 84, etc, and
may support the PROs.
It is currently unclear what level of networking support 2.10 will have;
Although I have not yet made any effort to move 4.3 networking into place,
at least two other sites have, and I hope to install some version of their
networking. At a minimum, it will have the 4.1a/b/c support it had before.
If you have any specific questions and/or comments, please contact me
directly. I will be posting more information in comp.bugs.2bsd as the
distribution details firm up.
Keith Bostic
ke...@okeeffe.berkeley.edu
ucbvax!keith
(415) 642-8524
|