Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA04100
	for pups-liszt; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 18:19:08 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au)
Received: from toulon.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (toulon.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.9])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA04096
	for <PUPS@MINNIE.CS.ADFA.OZ.AU>; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 18:19:04 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from leypold@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de)
Received: from informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (wintermute [134.2.12.56])
	by toulon.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D9DE91060; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 10:16:04 +0200 (MST)
Received: (from leypold@localhost)
	by informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA24598;
	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 10:16:01 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from leypold@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de)
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 10:16:01 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <200006190816.KAA24598@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Authentication-Warning: wintermute.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de: leypold set sender to leypold@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de using -f
From: Markus Leypold <leypold@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
To: SHOPPA@trailing-edge.com
Cc: PUPS@MINNIE.CS.ADFA.OZ.AU
In-reply-to: <000616202913.262000b0@trailing-edge.com> (message from Tim
	Shoppa on Fri, 16 Jun 2000 20:29:13 -0400)
Subject: Re: Yet Another "where does it fit" question
References:  <000616202913.262000b0@trailing-edge.com>
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

 > Delivered-To: leypold@lesbains.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
 > Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 20:29:13 -0400
 > From: Tim Shoppa <SHOPPA@trailing-edge.com>
 > Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
 > 
 > Yesterday I asked:
 > 
 > >Two tapes labeled "Vol 1 of 2" and "Vol 2 of 2" and then "2.10.2 SMS
 > >Unix".  Steven, does this mean you know what's on this and how it's
 > >different than the 2.10 and 2.10.1 stuff already in the archive? :-)  Terry
 > >didn't remember...
 > 
 > Now that I've read the tapes, this is a 1990-ish step halfway between
 > 2.10.1 and 2.11, as developed by Steven Schultz (and debugged by
 > Terry on his 11/70, judging from the comments.)  Is this something
 > worthwhile to put in the archive?  At the moment, looking at the
 > timeline of PDP-11 Unices currently in the archive, we have at the
 > "fairly recent" end:
 > 
 > 2.9 from 1983
 > 2.9.1BSD from 1983
 > 2.10BSD from 1987
 > 2.10.1BSD from 1989
 > 2.11BSD from the past year
 > 
 > Would it be a worthwhile thing to put 2.10.2 up as an intermediate
 > step filling in the ten year gap between 2.10.1 and the current 2.11?
 > I'm worried that whenever I find a metric buttload of Unix tapes that my

Hehe. That seems to be a real danger :-)

 > proposals of adding everything in them to the archive may just be
 > adding too much volume that folks simply aren't interested in.


Hi Tim,

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE. Seriously: If You ever do not want to put
something in the archive, give it to me. I have the impression one
needs the intermediate versions to be ever able to crosscheck the
transfer of features between the diverse branches.


Regards Markus.



 > 
 > -- 
 >  Tim Shoppa                        Email: shoppa@trailing-edge.com
 >  Trailing Edge Technology          WWW:   http://www.trailing-edge.com/
 >  7328 Bradley Blvd		   Voice: 301-767-5917
 >  Bethesda, MD, USA 20817           Fax:   301-767-5927
 > 

