Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA93867 for pups-liszt; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 04:16:41 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (root@nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA93858 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 04:16:36 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root@trang.nuxi.com [209.152.133.57]) by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA65551; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 11:13:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA05884; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 11:13:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 11:13:45 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Michael Sokolov Cc: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Subject: Re: PUPS/TUHS should not be divisive Message-ID: <20000617111345.H69941@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com References: <0006171504.AA02620@ivan.Harhan.ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <0006171504.AA02620@ivan.Harhan.ORG>; from msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG on Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 10:04:30AM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 10:04:30AM -0500, Michael Sokolov wrote: > If it isn't Ritchie and Thompson's original UNIX code, then it isn't UNIX. That is a fine opinion, and one understandable. BUT, I don't see Joy, McKusick, or Lefler on your list. So why is it again that you do 4.3BSD rather than some System III/V + 2BSD?? Joy & McKusick modified the AT&T kernel quite a bit. Or did you not know that they touched that code. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com)