Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA93311
	for pups-liszt; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 02:20:27 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au)
Received: from post3.fast.net (post3.fast.net [198.69.204.24])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA93307
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 02:20:23 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from kshuff@fast.net)
Received: from homer (maxtnt14-abe-489.fast.net [209.92.93.235])
	by post3.fast.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA01931
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:17:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <394BA7D6.52DD@fast.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:31:18 -0400
From: kshuff <kshuff@fast.net>
Reply-To: kshuff@fast.net
Organization: I'm not organized
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Subject: Re: PUPS/TUHS should not be divisive
References: <0006171504.AA02620@ivan.Harhan.ORG>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

Michael Sokolov wrote:

> If it isn't Ritchie and Thompson's original UNIX code, then it isn't UNIX. And
> I want UNIX, in four capitals with an R-in-circle superscript. I don't care
> about clones and workalikes and copycats. However "modern" they are, they are
> still mere clones and copycats. And I want the genuine article.
> 

  That might be fine and dandy for you, but other people do not share
your views
  and should not have to be criticized or belittled because they run
more "modern"
  hardware and not true UNIX.  We're not all living 20 years in the
past.

  K.S.