Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA55279
	for pups-liszt; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 00:14:34 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au)
Received: from lostwithiel.cley.com (lostwithiel.cley.com [212.240.242.98])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA55275
	for <PUPS@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 00:14:29 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from tfb@lostwithiel.cley.com)
Received: (from tfb@localhost)
	by lostwithiel.cley.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) id PAA20719
	for PUPS@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 15:11:31 +0100 (BST)
X-Mailer: 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 8 I);
	VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid
From: Tim Bradshaw <tfb@cley.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14660.61330.622418.671382@cley.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 15:11:30 +0100 (BST)
To: PUPS@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Subject: Re: PLEASE TAKE THIS ELSEWHERE (was Re: RX50 on RQDX3 on 2.11BSD)
In-Reply-To: <20000609152354.A60849@dragon.nuxi.com>
References: <000609165909.20200fd8@trailing-edge.com>
	<20000609152354.A60849@dragon.nuxi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

* David O'Brien wrote:

> This goes back to the UHS / PUPS discussion.  I didn't vote so before,
> but maybe it is time to separate the mail for the two.  I agree that the
> first posts were interesting in the historical insight that could be
> gained.  But this thread has turned into a rather long hardware
> discussion applicable to only a handful of people that have this
> hardware.

> I do not mean to be mean, but it seems moving this to some PDP-11 list (I
> guess one needs to be created) would be possible.

Please don't.  I love reading discussions of random old bits of
hardware, and such discussions have gone on on the PUPS list for a
long time.

--tim


