Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA39261
	for pups-liszt; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 11:57:16 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au)
Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (root@wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA39257
	for <PUPS@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 11:57:09 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from grog@wantadilla.lemis.com)
Received: (from grog@localhost)
	by wantadilla.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA63170;
	Sat, 10 Jun 2000 11:24:48 +0930 (CST)
	(envelope-from grog)
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 11:24:48 +0930
From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com>
Cc: Tim Shoppa <SHOPPA@trailing-edge.com>, PUPS@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Subject: Re: PLEASE TAKE THIS ELSEWHERE (was Re: RX50 on RQDX3 on 2.11BSD)
Message-ID: <20000610112448.K81728@wantadilla.lemis.com>
References: <000609165909.20200fd8@trailing-edge.com> <20000609152354.A60849@dragon.nuxi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i
In-Reply-To: <20000609152354.A60849@dragon.nuxi.com>
Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia
Phone: +61-8-8388-8286
Fax: +61-8-8388-8725
Mobile: +61-418-838-708
WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF  13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

On Friday,  9 June 2000 at 15:23:55 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 04:59:09PM -0400, Tim Shoppa wrote:
>>> This thread has gotten *way* beyond what I (and I'll bet many others)
>>> read this list for.
>>
>> I *think* you wrote this in reply to Steven Schultz's message, (at least
>
> Yes, I wrote it in reply to Steven's message.  Not it as not directed
> directly at Steven, it is for everyone that is engaged in this hardware
> discussion.
>
>> All of these are, IMHO, very worthy topics of discussion for a mailing
>> list about PDP-11 Unix, and they were all direct from the expert on the
>> subject(s).  What else would a subscriber to the PUPS list be looking for?
>
> This goes back to the UHS / PUPS discussion.  I didn't vote so before,
> but maybe it is time to separate the mail for the two.  I agree that the
> first posts were interesting in the historical insight that could be
> gained.  But this thread has turned into a rather long hardware
> discussion applicable to only a handful of people that have this
> hardware.
>
> I do not mean to be mean, but it seems moving this to some PDP-11 list (I
> guess one needs to be created) would be possible.

Well, FWIW this *is* the PDP-11 list.  But I thought it was
interesting way beyond the PDP-11 aspect.  Some of these things
(write-protected labels, for example) still shape FreeBSD, for
example.

I don't think we really have enough mail to justify two lists.  Most
of us probably ditch more than 50% of their mail every day anyway; if
this doesn't interest you, why not just delete it?

Greg
--
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

