Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 15:23:55 -0700
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com>
To: Tim Shoppa <SHOPPA@trailing-edge.com>
Cc: PUPS@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Subject: Re: PLEASE TAKE THIS ELSEWHERE (was Re: RX50 on RQDX3 on 2.11BSD)
Message-ID: <20000609152354.A60849@dragon.nuxi.com>
Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com
References: <000609165909.20200fd8@trailing-edge.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <000609165909.20200fd8@trailing-edge.com>; from SHOPPA@trailing-edge.com on Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 04:59:09PM -0400
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 04:59:09PM -0400, Tim Shoppa wrote:
> > This thread has gotten *way* beyond what I (and I'll bet many others)
> > read this list for.
> 
> I *think* you wrote this in reply to Steven Schultz's message, (at least

Yes, I wrote it in reply to Steven's message.  Not it as not directed
directly at Steven, it is for everyone that is engaged in this hardware
discussion.  

> All of these are, IMHO, very worthy topics of discussion for a mailing
> list about PDP-11 Unix, and they were all direct from the expert on the
> subject(s).  What else would a subscriber to the PUPS list be looking for?

This goes back to the UHS / PUPS discussion.  I didn't vote so before,
but maybe it is time to separate the mail for the two.  I agree that the
first posts were interesting in the historical insight that could be
gained.  But this thread has turned into a rather long hardware
discussion applicable to only a handful of people that have this
hardware.

I do not mean to be mean, but it seems moving this to some PDP-11 list (I
guess one needs to be created) would be possible.

-- 
-- David    (obrien@NUXI.com)