Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA23073
	for pups-liszt; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 06:56:27 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au)
Received: from ns1.teraglobal.com (ns1.teraglobal.com [63.210.171.3])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA23069
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 06:56:24 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from rivie@teraglobal.com)
Received: from [10.10.50.26] (208.186.13.23) by ns1.teraglobal.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Wed, 7 Jun 2000 13:54:07 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: rivie@ns1.teraglobal.com
Message-Id: <v04210100b564661bc3fe@[10.10.50.26]>
In-Reply-To: 
 <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006071443590.6772-100000@guildenstern.shaffstall.com>
References: 
 <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006071443590.6772-100000@guildenstern.shaffstall.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 14:54:01 -0600
To: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
From: Roger Ivie <rivie@teraglobal.com>
Subject: Re: RQDX3 software interleave
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

> Speaking of PITA
>device control, wasn't it the DEC RX02 that wrote address information in
>single density and data in DD?

Yes, it was. But it was usually done by the hardware (I suppose that
would be microcode in the case of the RX02), so unless you wanted to
do something foolish like read RX02 diskettes in your DD CP/M machine
or format floppies you don't have to worry about it.

--
Roger Ivie
rivie@teraglobal.com
Not speaking for TeraGlobal Communications Corporation

