Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA84679
	for pups-liszt; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 02:56:00 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au)
Received: from relay01.chello.nl (smtp.chello.nl [212.83.68.144])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA84675
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 02:55:55 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from wkb@chello.nl)
Received: from chello.nl ([213.46.78.184]) by relay01.chello.nl
          (InterMail vK.4.02.00.00 201-232-116 license 2ee4e7c625482f2f2a1950a80f6c8d58)
          with ESMTP id <20000601165436.JAHT13246.relay01@chello.nl>;
          Thu, 1 Jun 2000 18:54:36 +0200
Received: (from wkb@localhost)
	by chello.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA99179;
	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 18:53:57 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wkb)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 18:53:57 +0200
From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@chello.nl>
To: Warren Toomey <wkt@cs.adfa.edu.au>
Cc: Unix Heritage Society <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Future Direction for PUPS and UHS
Message-ID: <20000601185357.E99044@freebie.wbnet>
Reply-To: wc.bulte@chello.nl
References: <200006010025.KAA49471@henry.cs.adfa.edu.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <200006010025.KAA49471@henry.cs.adfa.edu.au>; from wkt@cs.adfa.edu.au on Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 10:25:34AM +1000
X-OS: FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE
X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 10:25:34AM +1000, Warren Toomey wrote:

> So, I want to survey the mailing list here for ideas about the charter of
> the Unix Heritage Society, and a way of setting up one or multiple archives,
> mailing lists, web pages etc. as I originally envisioned.
> 
> Questions:
> 	- should we keep one archive, or have multiple archives?

Multiple.

> 	- if one, what structure (divisions on platforms, on vendors etc.)

I'd distinguish by CPU / machine / vendor. Eg. PDP, VAX, Sun68k, etc.
Maybe one should also distinguish by source code / binary-only. People like
David are mostly interested in the sources, which I think makes good sense.
But if you find yourself with an old box a binary kit sure beats no OS at
all.

> 	- do you want this current mailing list to stay ``all-encompassing'',
> 	  or would you rather have more specific lists?

Depends on the traffic. One could argue a generic 'announce' list and 
a set of platform dependent lists would be best. But maybe it is too early
to nail this down.

> One final comment before you answer. There's a very diverse bunch of
> people on this mailing list, some with strong opinions. Please be prepared
> to accept someone's comments as what they want, don't tell them that they
> are wrong, but let us know what you'd like to see.
> 
> Many thanks,
> 	Warren
> 
> [ now stands back for the deluge! ]

<splash> ;-)

-- 
Wilko Bulte 	FreeBSD, the power to serve  	http://www.freebsd.org

