Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA19237
	for pups-liszt; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 12:08:01 +1100 (EST)
Received: from shelbyville.oai.com (IDENT:root@shelbyville.alcita.com [204.57.59.144] (may be forged))
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA19231
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 12:07:52 +1100 (EST)
Received: (from mirian@localhost)
	by shelbyville.oai.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA03298;
	Wed, 26 Jan 2000 20:00:59 -0500
From: Mirian Crzig Lennox <lennox@alcita.com>
To: UNIX Heritage Society <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Sun release source code for Solaris 8
References: <20000127110321.I53307@freebie.lemis.com>
Original-Sender: lennox@alcita.com
Organization: Alcita Technologies, Inc.
Date: 26 Jan 2000 20:00:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: Greg Lehey's message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:03:21 +1030"
Message-ID: <m3aels1g6u.fsf@shelbyville.oai.com>
Lines: 13
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> writes:
> 
> The conditions look rather like the SCO ancient UNIX licences, but
> it's *cheaper* ($75, which includes deliverables from Sun).  Warren,
> is this ammunition to lobby SCO to drop the prices of Ancient UNIX
> licenses?

After looking at the site, it seems as though Sun is trying to prevent
licence holders from sharing code with other licence holders.  If this
is true, it would certainly make the Solaris licence less desirable to
hobbyists than the ancient UNIX licence, unfortunately.

--Mirian

