Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA51689
	for pups-liszt; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:33:16 +1100 (EST)
Received: from henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (henry.cs.adfa.edu.au [131.236.21.158])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA51683
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:32:54 +1100 (EST)
Received: (from wkt@localhost)
	by henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.2/8.9.3) id JAA38496
	for pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:32:53 +1100 (EST)
From: Warren Toomey <wkt@cs.adfa.edu.au>
Message-Id: <200001062232.JAA38496@henry.cs.adfa.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Viral Unix Compiler
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20000106082343.01638ec0@pc> from John Foust at "Jan 6, 2000  8:23:43 am"
To: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (Unix Heritage Society)
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:32:53 +1100 (EST)
Reply-To: wkt@cs.adfa.edu.au
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

In article by John Foust:
> 
> Has it ever been independently established that this viral 
> version of the compiler ever actually existed, or was this 
> just a parable about viral code?
> 
> - John

I've asked Dennis. I'll relay any replies.

	Warren