Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA49497
	for pups-liszt; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 01:25:03 +1100 (EST)
Received: from threedee.com (mail.threedee.com [209.83.65.10])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA49487
	for <PUPS@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 01:24:42 +1100 (EST)
Received: from winnie (winnie [192.198.5.13]) by threedee.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA27249 for <PUPS@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 08:24:27 -0600
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000106082343.01638ec0@pc>
X-Sender: jfoust@pc
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 08:23:43 -0600
To: PUPS@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
From: John Foust <jfoust@threedee.com>
Subject: Re: Viral Unix Compiler
In-Reply-To: <000106081641.202001e1@trailing-edge.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk


Has it ever been independently established that this viral 
version of the compiler ever actually existed, or was this 
just a parable about viral code?

- John