Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA73337
	for pups-liszt; Sat, 18 Dec 1999 05:38:01 +1100 (EST)
Received: from moe.2bsd.com (0@MOE.2BSD.COM [206.139.202.200])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA73332
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Sat, 18 Dec 1999 05:37:31 +1100 (EST)
Received: (from sms@localhost)
	by moe.2bsd.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id KAA04095
	for pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:22:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:22:39 -0800 (PST)
From: "Steven M. Schultz" <sms@moe.2bsd.com>
Message-Id: <199912171822.KAA04095@moe.2bsd.com>
To: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Subject: Re: Installing UNIX on an 11/94
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

Hi -

> From: Johnny Billquist <bqt@Update.UU.SE>
> Agree. I'd like to get my hands on a /94 myself... :-)

	An 11/93 would be nice too, Qbus systems use less power and make less
	noise from what I have seen.

> Less powerhungry, yes. It also takes less space on the Unibus, and is
> faster. But I wasn't aware that the DEUNA had any more bugs than the
> DELUA. Please enlight me. (I only use DELUAs myself, but I have one or two
> DEUNAs lying around).

	I know the DEQNA had firmware problems that could cause the board to
	lock up under load - perhaps I was confusing the DEQNA and DEUNA.
	The later Qbus board (DELQA) was much nicer in the same way that the
	DELUA is better than the DEUNA.

	Steven Schultz
	sms@moe.2bsd.com