Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA03622
	for pups-liszt; Fri, 15 Oct 1999 06:04:30 +1000 (EST)
Received: from rachael.franken.de (rachael.franken.de [193.175.24.38])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA03618
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Fri, 15 Oct 1999 06:04:21 +1000 (EST)
Received: by rachael.franken.de
	via sendmail with stdio
	id <m11br6X-0027TtC@rachael.franken.de>
	for pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 21:04:01 +0100 (MET)
	(Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #4 built DST-Sep-8)
Received: from chico.franken.de(193.175.24.33)
 via SMTP by rachael.franken.de, id smtpdAAAa17549; Thu Oct 14 21:03:24 1999
Received: from mbsks.UUCP by chico.franken.de (Smail3.2 #2) with UUCP
	for minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au!pups
	id m11br5v-005CNsC; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 22:03:23 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by mbsks.franken.de (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14)
	id m11br2U-000jzQC; Thu, 14 Oct 99 21:59 MET DST
Message-Id: <m11br2U-000jzQC@mbsks.franken.de>
From: m@mbsks.franken.de (Matthias Bruestle)
Subject: Re: vtserver
In-Reply-To: <199910141718.TAA01066@yedi.iaf.nl> from Wilko Bulte at "Oct 14, 99 07:18:02 pm"
To: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 21:59:50 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

Mahlzeit


As Warren Toomey wrote ...
> Sorry for the delay Kirk. It could be that the V7 bootstrap expects
> split I/D, or a different I/O mapping then what's provided on the /34.

I'm 99% sure, that it's V7 which I have running (for lower values
of running, because one drive is dead and the power supply needs
to be replaced) on my 11/34A with 128kB RAM and two RL01. I think
I wanted to install V6, but installed V7 because of the RL01 drivers.
I stripped V7 down, so I only needed one RL01 disk pack (I have only
two.) and transfered the disk image via kermit.

I want to install 2.11BSD on my M70 with 512kB RAM (No, more RAM is
to expensive here. 1MB for over US$500.) and a 120MB ST506-type disk,
but had not much time. I want to avoid the way of the disk image,
because I have no BSD installed for the emulator and don't know,
if the transfere of slices of the disk image would be successfull.
(The RT-11 only handles 32MB "disks".) I think the best way would
be to boot from a 2.11BSD floppy and install it via serial port.
(TU-58 emu? Are there 1.2MB 2.11BSD floppies somewhere?)


Mahlzeit

endergone Zwiebeltuete

-- 
insanity inside

