Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA00659
	for pups-liszt; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 18:07:17 +1000 (EST)
Received: from zed.ludd.luth.se (zed.ludd.luth.se [130.240.16.33])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA00643;
	Thu, 2 Sep 1999 18:05:30 +1000 (EST)
Received: from father.ludd.luth.se (ragge@father.ludd.luth.se [130.240.16.18])
	by zed.ludd.luth.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA22337;
	Thu, 2 Sep 1999 10:05:25 +0200
From: Anders Magnusson <ragge@ludd.luth.se>
Received: (ragge@localhost) by father.ludd.luth.se (8.6.11/8.6.11) id KAA11504; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 10:05:24 +0200
Message-Id: <199909020805.KAA11504@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: KDA50 woes
To: quasijarus@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 10:05:23 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au, quasijarus@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
In-Reply-To: <9909020115.AA00610@meson.jpsystems.com> from Michael Sokolov at "Sep 1, 99 08:15:23 pm"
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL15 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

> Hi,
> 
> I wonder, does anyone here know anything about the KDA50? I've solved my RA72
>
Well, something I think... :-)

[...]
> 
> So my questions to the folks are: First, is my understanding of the situation
> correct? Second, what can be done about it? I guess as a temporary solution I
> can remove this problematic IPL autodetection code and hard-code the IPL of my
> KDA50, but what is it? Is the IPL set with switches on the KDA50 or how? And
> what do the KDA50 switches do in the first place? Does anyone know? TIA.
> 
The IPL autodetect code has seemed to me as unneccessary. You know that
the KDA50 will always interrupt at spl5, so you can hard-code it in
the interrupt driver and nuke the autodetect code. The same with the 
other drivers that can be on Qbus:

	if (uh->uh_type == QBA)
		spl5();

-- Ragge

