Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id DAA23748 for pups-liszt; Wed, 24 Feb 1999 03:01:12 +1100 (EST) Received: from bartlet.df.lth.se (jesper@bartlet.df.lth.se [194.47.252.146]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA23743 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 1999 03:01:02 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (jesper@localhost) by bartlet.df.lth.se (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA21777 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 17:00:54 +0100 Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 17:00:54 +0100 (CET) From: Jesper Nilsson To: PDP Unix Preservation Society Subject: SCO Source license tainting? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk Tjo! I have a question that I hope someone can help me with: I'm thinking about getting myself a SCO Source license, but I'm worried that I might get "tainted" by this since my day job involves writing operating systems... My employer would not appreciate getting sued because of my hobbies...:-) Has anyone done research about this aspect of the license? My goals are twofold, running an older Unix version on my PDP-11's, and of course I want to peruse the source of the classic versions. /^JN - Jesper Nilsson -- I've heard of UNIseX, but I've never had it. Jesper Nilsson -- jesper@df.lth.se