Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA19811
	for pups-liszt; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 13:23:12 +1100 (EST)
Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA19802
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 13:23:01 +1100 (EST)
Received: from world.std.com by europe.std.com (STD1.2/BZS-8-1.0)
	id VAA08719; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 21:22:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: by world.std.com (TheWorld/Spike-2.0)
	id AA21412; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 21:22:56 -0500
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 21:22:56 -0500
From: allisonp@world.std.com (Allison J Parent)
Message-Id: <199902190222.AA21412@world.std.com>
To: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: Venix (was Re: 2.9BSD:  mbuf.h)
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

<DELQA is not 68k, The DEUNA is.  The DELQA is a cost reduced version 
<(less buggy too) of the DEQNA and is largely logically the same as the 
<DEQNA.

Memory parity exception...  Eat foot time.

DELQA M7516 is 68k and lance chip... had to pull mine to check.  The M7504
however I am correct as I pulled one down from the shelf before dining on 
foot.  Oh and the reson I forgot it's 68k, was the DELQA is far more 
reliable!  that and I only open the BA123 one a year to check the fans and 
clean dust.  It just don't break. ;)

Allison