Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA19674
	for pups-liszt; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 12:57:56 +1100 (EST)
Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA19669
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 12:57:47 +1100 (EST)
Received: from world.std.com by europe.std.com (STD1.2/BZS-8-1.0)
	id UAA05789; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 20:57:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: by world.std.com (TheWorld/Spike-2.0)
	id AA29020; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 20:57:38 -0500
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 20:57:38 -0500
From: allisonp@world.std.com (Allison J Parent)
Message-Id: <199902190157.AA29020@world.std.com>
To: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: Venix (was Re: 2.9BSD:  mbuf.h)
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

<I'm sorry. I didn't mean to imply that you were wrong, just that I was.

Not an argument, just posting to the group what went private by error.

<Never looked carefully at RQDX?, but the DELQA uses an M68K, that much I
<*do* know. (As do the DELUA)

Having two Qbus VAXen and several Qbus PDP-11s it's old turf.  Also I worked 
for DEC Engineering.  that and I've done a lot of hardware level work on my 
systems (repaired dead boards) so the designs are more familair.

<You obviously knows more about this than I do. :-)
<However, as I said, atleast the DELQA have an M68K...
<And the DEQNA is old, yes...

DELQA is not 68k, The DEUNA is.  The DELQA is a cost reduced version 
(less buggy too) of the DEQNA and is largely logically the same as the 
DEQNA.

<> The DEUNA is quite different.
<
<Obviously. But it is also pretty old. Not as buggy though, which should
<have been a clue. :-)

Also The DELUA.

Allison