Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 00:24:43 +0100 (MET)
From: Johnny Billquist <bqt@Update.UU.SE>
To: Ken Wellsch <kcwellsc@math.uwaterloo.ca>
cc: James Lothian <simul8@simul8.demon.co.uk>, pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: Venix (was Re: 2.9BSD:  mbuf.h)
In-Reply-To: <199902181846.NAA05766@math.uwaterloo.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.VUL.3.93.990219002351.1502D-100000@Zeke.Update.UU.SE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Ken Wellsch wrote:

> I'm going to give up as I seem to remember nothing anymore... sigh.
> Allison also sent e-mail saying the DEQNA is not T-11 based.  I guess
> I'm thinking of an RQDX3.  I've had no place to unpack my old iron in
> over three years and certainly miss being able to pick up the part in
> question before foaming at the mouth spouting nonsense. Many apologies
> for suggesting such major inaccuracies.  -- Ken
> 
> P.S.  Allison describe the DEQNA as a state-driven device with PALs
>       (I think) and that "big F" may the the gate array also mentioned.

You might not be totally out. I also thought the DEQNA was T-11 based,
since the DEUNA is. :-)

	Johnny

Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                  ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt@update.uu.se           ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol