Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA00561
	for pups-liszt; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:13:17 +1100 (EST)
Received: from moe.2bsd.com (0@MOE.2BSD.COM [206.139.202.200])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA00553
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:13:07 +1100 (EST)
Received: (from sms@localhost)
	by moe.2bsd.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id VAA15671
	for pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 21:12:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 21:12:57 -0800 (PST)
From: "Steven M. Schultz" <sms@moe.2bsd.com>
Message-Id: <199901270512.VAA15671@moe.2bsd.com>
To: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Subject: UNIX robustness
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

	At least it's a different thread... ;-)

	I had a UNIX system in my house that ran (and was working hard
	the whole time) for over 2 years before pity was taken on it
	and a beefier replacement system installed.  The original system
	was a 386/33 serving as a rather busy secondary nameserver and was
	never touched/rebooted/powercycled for 2+ years.  As time went on the 
	load increased and it became apparent the system was overloaded (and 
	paging excessively) so a P5/90 with more memory was installed.  A
	couple months after that the disk died ;-)

	Steven

