Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA20395
	for pups-liszt; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:43:36 +1100 (EST)
Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA20384
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:43:22 +1100 (EST)
Received: from world.std.com [world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]] by europe.std.com (8.7.6/BZS-8-1.0)
	id WAA16899; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:43:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: by world.std.com (TheWorld/Spike-2.0)
	id AA19655; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:43:14 -0500
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:43:14 -0500
From: allisonp@world.std.com (Allison J Parent)
Message-Id: <199901270343.AA19655@world.std.com>
To: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: 4.4BSD
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk


<Eventually I will support almost every VAX ever made, just like Ultrix. The
<is no reason why it can't be done. If Ultrix, a close 4.3BSD derivative, co
<do this, so can 4.3BSD-* itself.

Then it might almst be as common as VMS... not likely.  Ultrix never drive 
every VAX nor was it as robust as VMS.  It will still not be a 24x7x365 OS 
of any standing until proven so by use, not assertion.

Allison