Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA19191 for pups-liszt; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 10:48:18 +1100 (EST) Received: from post.mail.demon.net (finch-post-10.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.38]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA19185 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 10:48:09 +1100 (EST) Received: from [158.152.152.109] (helo=falstaf.demon.co.uk) by post.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 105IDD-0002AZ-00; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 23:48:04 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 23:46:16 +0000 To: wkt@cs.adfa.oz.au Cc: Unix Heritage Society From: Robin Birch Subject: Re: Split of PUPS mail list?? References: <199901262244.JAA05790@henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <199901262244.JAA05790@henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Turnpike (32) Version 4.01 Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk In message <199901262244.JAA05790@henry.cs.adfa.edu.au>, Warren Toomey writes >All, > Both Steven Schultz and Johnny Billquist have suggested a split >of the existing PUPS mailing list into a number of mailing lists. As the >maintainer of the list, I am not in a position to force a decision either >way: instead, I think it should be driven by the list members. > >Please email me your suggestions, desires etc w.r.t this issue. I will >post a summary sometime next week, and we can then decide what to do. > >Many thanks, > > Warren FWITW I vote for a split, if only to make the filing easier. If people feel as strongly as some do about not wanting one of the lists then fine, that makes it easier. Something similar is in place at NetBSD if you want just notices, posts on one type of OS or whatever. Cheers Robin ____________________________________________________________________ Robin Birch robin@falstaf.demon.co.uk M1ASU/2E0ARJ Old computers and radios always welcome