Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA08513
	for pups-liszt; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:13:07 +1100 (EST)
Received: from henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA08502
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:12:58 +1100 (EST)
Received: (from wkt@localhost)
	by henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA11557;
	Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:13:39 +1100 (EST)
	(envelope-from wkt)
From: Warren Toomey <wkt@henry.cs.adfa.edu.au>
Message-Id: <199901050613.RAA11557@henry.cs.adfa.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Why is csh `restricted'?
In-Reply-To: <199901050609.WAA19671@moe.2bsd.com> from "Steven M. Schultz" at "Jan 4, 1999 10: 9:48 pm"
To: sms@moe.2bsd.com (Steven M. Schultz)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:13:39 +1100 (EST)
Cc: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au, wkt@cs.adfa.oz.au
Reply-To: wkt@cs.adfa.oz.au
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

In article by Steven M. Schultz:
> 	Hmmm, didn't the V7 shell borrow from the V6 shell?  Perhaps not
> 	completely "based on" (as in starting from a copy and editing away).
> 	Steven

No, from what I heard Bourne nearly started from scratch. I did have
a copy of some old Usenet news from John Mashey about the v6 shell; I'll
try to dig it up.

	Warren