From: Warren Toomey <wkt@henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199808040415.OAA17823@henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Extending the cheap SCO src license
To: rdkeys@seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys)
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:15:23 +1000 (EST)
Cc: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
In-Reply-To: <199808031342.JAA17517@seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> from "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" at "Aug 3, 98 09:42:53 am"
Reply-To: wkt@cs.adfa.oz.au
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk

In article by User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys:
> Do any of us really want SysV?

Not me :-)

> Where SCO would feel that we are too close to home, then maybe only a
> binary license of some sort would be all that we could collectively expect.
> What about something like 386BSD?  That began in the 4.3BSD era if I am

I've got 386BSD 0.1 sources, but no binaries.

> reading things corectly, and it sure walks and quacks like the real thing.
> These kinds of things, I would think, are of merit to keep archives of,
> for the purposes and goals that we collectively seem be be heading towards.

I collect most anything :-) UNIX, Unix, [1234]BSD, Minix etc etc.
Don't really want System III or V though, or Slowaris.
 
Ciao,
	Warren