Message-ID: <35C138FB.A77E57E3@halcyon.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 20:24:43 -0700
From: "David C. Jenner" <djenner@halcyon.com>
Reply-To: djenner@halcyon.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
CC: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: OUPS (was: PUPS and BUPS (burp!) thoughts.....)
References: <199807310120.LAA08798@henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk

I vote for one list.  Leave it PUPS, and call it the
Past/Prehistoric/Perpetual Unix Preservation Society
or something like that.  Or think up a "P" adjective
that glorifies the olden Unix.

Almost everything has been cross-posted up to this point,
and I get two copies anyway!

Dave

Warren Toomey wrote:
> 
> In article by Greg Lehey:
> > Are we really so many disparate people that we need two lists?  I'd
> > guess that most people would be on both lists.  How about just a name
> > change, to "Old UNIX Preservation Society"?
> >
> > Greg
> 
> I don't know, I thought that it would give people more flexibility,
> and shield people from stuff they didn't want to see. So lets ask:
> 
> If you're on the PUPS list, do you want to see stuff about non PDP-11 Unixes?
> 
> If you're on the BUPS list, do you want to see stuff about PDP-11 Unixes.
> 
> Cheers all,
> 
>         Warren