Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA08328
	for pups-liszt; Thu, 7 May 1998 02:15:26 +1000 (EST)
Received: from chico.franken.de (dns.franken.de [193.175.24.33])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA08323
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Thu, 7 May 1998 02:15:20 +1000 (EST)
Received: from mbsks.UUCP by chico.franken.de with UUCP
	(Smail3.2 #2) id m0yX7D7-005CHzC; Wed, 6 May 1998 18:38:25 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by mbsks.franken.de (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14)
	id m0yX7Dl-000HqdC; Wed, 6 May 98 18:39 MET DST
Message-Id: <m0yX7Dl-000HqdC@mbsks.franken.de>
From: m@mbsks.franken.de (Matthias Bruestle)
Subject: Re: Installation of 2.11BSD (II)
In-Reply-To: <19980506163710.A329@freebie.lemis.com> from Greg Lehey at "May 6, 98 04:37:10 pm"
To: grog@lemis.com (Greg Lehey)
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 18:39:05 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: wkt@cs.adfa.oz.au, pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk

Mahlzeit


According to Greg Lehey:
> Well, I started an answer, and decided that Steven would be able to
> answer better, but since you mention my name, OK, here I am.
Thanks. :)

> > Is this a problem with the distribution, with the emulator or with
> > the compiler (gcc 2.7.2.1)?
> First, the compiler is certainly not gcc.  That would never fit in the
The compiler which compiled the emulator is gcc. Log time ago I compiled
someones emulator with gcc 2.5.8 and it did only work without any
optimization.

> nor that it's easy to set up.  It took me quite a while.  Take a look
> at the files in ftp://ftp.lemis.com/pub/pups.  They are:
Fine, I will try it this night or tomorrow.


Thanks

endergone Zwiebeltuete

-- 
insanity inside

