Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA20530
	for pups-liszt; Wed, 25 Mar 1998 16:10:24 +1100 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
Received: from moe.2bsd.com (0@MOE.2BSD.COM [206.139.202.200])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA20521
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Wed, 25 Mar 1998 16:10:16 +1100 (EST)
Received: (from sms@localhost)
	by moe.2bsd.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA16340
	for pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Tue, 24 Mar 1998 21:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 21:06:26 -0800 (PST)
From: "Steven M. Schultz" <sms@moe.2bsd.com>
Message-Id: <199803250506.VAA16340@moe.2bsd.com>
To: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: More on Disk Images -> Disk
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk

Greg -

> I've done a little bit of playing around with gzip 1.2.4.  It works on

	Are gzip and gunzip comparable in size?  I'm curious if the 
	decompression is more 'address space' hungry than the act of 
	compression (or vice-versa).

> 16 bit MS-DOS platforms with a bit of  tweaking, and I got all modules
> to compile under 2.11BSD.  Unfortunately, I ended up  with a couple of
> undefined references on linking, and I haven't had time  to look at it

	Which symbols came up missing/undefined?

> > If we can get gunzip running in 64K on V7, I can then move it to a
> 
> Should be doable.

	It's actually 56kb or less - have to leave room for the stack and
	other data (strings, etc)

	Steven


