Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA21405
	for pups-liszt; Mon, 8 Dec 1997 04:19:06 +1100 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
Received: from indy.dunnington.york.ac.uk (ppp6.york.ac.uk [144.32.4.106])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA21400
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Mon, 8 Dec 1997 04:18:57 +1100 (EST)
Received: by indy.dunnington.york.ac.uk (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	for pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au id RAA01057; Sun, 7 Dec 1997 17:18:47 GMT
From: "Pete Turnbull <pnt103@cs.york.ac.uk>" <pete@indy.dunnington.york.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <9712071718.ZM1055@indy.dunnington.york.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 17:18:36 +0000
Reply-To: pnt103@cs.york.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.2 10apr95 MediaMail)
To: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: PDP-11: Disk over Serial proposal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk

On Dec 6, 21:17, Tim Shoppa wrote:

> Many (most) Q-bus processors have TU58 bootstraps in firmware.
> Certainly all 11/73B, 11/83, 11/93, 11/84, and 11/94 have the
> bootstraps.

Are you sure, Tim?  My 11/73 doesn't, and according to my microPDP-11
Maintenance Manual, only the 11/23+ and microPDP-11/23 have TU58 -- the only
tape devices listed for 11/73 and 11/83 are TK25 and TK50 (my manual is too
old to include 11/53 and 11/93).

-- 

Pete						Peter Turnbull
						Dept. of Computer Science
						University of York

