Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA16464
	for pups-liszt; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 14:12:58 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA16459
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 14:12:52 +1000 (EST)
Received: from world.std.com by europe.std.com (8.7.6/BZS-8-1.0)
	id AAA08702; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 00:12:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0)
	id AA13660; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 00:12:45 -0400
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 00:12:45 -0400
From: allisonp@world.std.com (Allison J Parent)
Message-Id: <199710100412.AA13660@world.std.com>
To: djenner@halcyon.com
Subject: Re: PDP-11 Xenix
Cc: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk

Dave,

<I don't think John has it at ftp.dbit.com.  And I doubt that XENIX is
<anywhere on the net.  I don't even know if there was a PDP-11 XENIX. (It
<was originally MS, afterall.  They "sold" it to SCO way back, before SCO
<collected everything else.)

Your right, drain beth,  err brain death. Sometimes all those *nixs are the 
same to me.  Especially after configuring three vaxen for VMS and installing 
it.  I know heresy but, Netbsd has proven uninstallable here on all four 
systems.

<DEC Pro350/380, which is, essentially, a PDP-11.  There was also a VENIX
<for "real" PDP-11s.

Well venix on the pro350 runs far better than POS!  In fact it's the only 
*nix running here as even slackware has had problems (bad CD!).

That however is news! Is there a version of venix for "real" PDP-11s? on 
the net?

Allison