[owen@autodesk.com: Re: More questions.]

Al Globus (globus@nas.nasa.gov)
Tue, 6 Dec 1994 13:35:01 -0800

> vrml is for us, you seemed to be offhandedly tossing our efforts away
> in a manner I didn't wnat to let go by uncommented.

I'm not throwing anyone's efforts away. I am a little concerned
that popular terminology get's overused to the point that it
is meaningless. 3D interactive graphics is great stuff, whether its called
VR or not. I feel, although not all agree, that the term VR
should be reserved for immersive environments.