Re: TECH: One possible direction ...

Richard Gehr (rgehr@panix.com)
Mon, 13 Jun 1994 11:17:51 -0400 (EDT)


On Sun, 12 Jun 1994, Craig Presson wrote:

>
> Maybe we could put up a working document on the fundamental
> object hierarchy of WWVR, and get some ideas from that about
> how much detail is forced into the language and how much
> can be left out.
>
> Sorta like,
>
> PLACES
> BUILDINGS
> ROOMS
> ROUTES
> ROADS
> STAIRS
> OPERATORS
> AVATARS
>
> ...
>
> Of course it should be in an OODL, but I'm in a hurry and scribbling.
>
>
>
> -- fcp@nuance.com (Craig Presson) 72430.1422@compuserve.com
> President & Principal, T4 Computer Security ----------------
> (205) 880-7692 Voice, -7691 FAX -----------------------------
>
>