While we're at it, why don't we work on methods of publishing books
so no one can read them. People might understand the words and learn
from them.
>There are, IMO, a couple of good reasons to keep the source readily
>available. 1) Authors improve their skills quickly by copying techniques
>from each other, and, in the process, the overall quality of the Web
>increases in a consistent manner. 2) Having open HTML source makes it easy
>to write robots, worms, spiders and other intelligent agents that can surf
>the Web on our behalf building indexes and databases.
Lance is clearly in the right here. After all, the point of the Internet
isn't to create a cottage industry for people who have learned HTML.
Nuf said?
Richard Goerwitz
goer@midway.uchicago.edu