Re: test of new Location header usage

Joseph R Barge (jrbarge@umich.edu)
Thu, 10 Aug 1995 23:35:28 -0400 (EDT)


Thanks for resonding

On Wed, 9 Aug 1995, Joseph R Barge wrote:

> Could someone please take me off of this list. My reason for signing on
> has since disappeared so I would greatly appreciate instructions to help
> me, or if someone just did it I would be eternally grateful!! Thank You
>
> On Wed, 9 Aug 1995, Rob Hartill wrote:
>
> >
> > > Only historical reason : the first spec (CGI 1.0) defined only `Content-type'
> > > and `Location'. `Status' was added for CGI 1.1
> > >
> > > I don't know why you want add a status code, when Location imply a code 302.
> >
> > Location doesn't necessarily imply "302". "301" is prefectly acceptable,
> > and preferably in many cases.
> >
> >
> > rob
> >
> >
>
>