Re: Forms support in clients

Karl Auerbach (karl@cavebear.com)
Sun, 25 Sep 94 23:05:50 PDT


>>No - he wants documents that can be more like programs. basically he
>>wants to display the form, have the user fill in what doc he
>>would like (as an example) and then have the browser do a text
>>substitution on the ACTION part before performing the GET.
>
>There's been some talk around here, as I vaguely recall, about TCL for this
>sort of thing. Any thoughts, anyone, on the idea of letting TCL swallow up
>HTML, so that we have a real UI language that contains a real hypertext
>language, instead of trying to built a UI language out of a hypertext
>language? (Which just ain't gonna happen, I suspect...)

Please not TCL. It is intrinsicly inefficient and, to my eyes, quite
inelegant.

(My preference is Scheme, but I somehow suspect that this isn't
necessarily going to be popular with People who have been brought
up on shell programming and C.)

Whatever, the language, the important issues are a secure/safe
abstract machine in which it is to execute.

On viewers, I suspect execution efficency isn't particularly important
when talking about display generation or forms. But once the door is
opened a little, some folk are going to want to do more general
computations.

If we talk about execution on the servers or in caches, then I think
we need to be concerned about efficiency.

The larger issue when one starts talking about pushing executable
candy-grams around the network is controlling those that have more
than an extremely short life span.

--karl--