Re: Quality problems - AGREE!

prosyst@Onramp.NET
Thu, 14 Apr 94 16:29:45 PDT


Good Point!

But, does it have to go all the way to the server?
I wonder if there could be an updated index rather than
physical address.

...........dennis.............
<<>>..04/14/94..16:30:01...<<>>
-------------------------------
Dennis J. Vandine at ProSysTech
prosyst@onramp.net 214.414.5302
-------------------------------
"PC Supersonic Transport"- AT&T
-------------------------------

>I can give one reason for giving the relocation message -- you may be
>trying to migrate a server from one location to another. In that
>instance, you'll want to leave up notices of the change for a while (long
>enough for people to fix their pointers), but you don't want to leave up
>the old server permanently. After all, what's the point of moving the
>server if you've still got the old server giving out redirections? :)
>
> -et
>
>On Thu, 14 Apr 1994 prosyst@Onramp.NET wrote:
>
>> Jacob,
>>
>> I totally agree; plus, instead of giving a message like you
>> sometimes get from a phone company, for example:
>>
>> "Sorry you must NOT dial a "1" in front of this number..."
>> Why not just assume "no 1" and not bother with the message.
>>
>> In the case of "this xxx relocated to yyy," why not just
>> link to "yyy" instead of bothering with the message, or,
>> notify with the message and still link them there.
>>
>

...........dennis.............
<<>>..04/14/94..16:29:45...<<>>
-------------------------------
Dennis J. Vandine at ProSysTech
prosyst@onramp.net 214.414.5302
-------------------------------
"PC Supersonic Transport"- AT&T
-------------------------------