Re: Multipart/mixed for many inline images (was Re: Toward Closure on HTML)

Rainer Klute (klute@tommy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de)
Fri, 08 Apr 1994 14:54:25 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Matt Timmermans/MSL: "Re: SGML wierdness #743 [Was: Toward Closure on HTML ]"
Previous message: Chris Lilley, Computer Graphics Unit: "Re: Fate of <P> [Was: Toward Closure on HTML]"
In reply to: Chris Lilley, Computer Graphics Unit: "Multipart/mixed for many inline images (was Re: Toward Closure on HTML)"
Next in thread: Matt Heffron: "Re: Multipart/mixed for many inline images (was Re: Toward Closure on HTML)"

>Marc suggested that my suggestion wasted already cached images, which is true;
>but then if they are all retrieved in a block the inefficiency is not that
>great.

Yes, but costs are also an issue. Many of us (including me)
have to pay for each byte transferred over an international
connection.

Best regards
Rainer Klute

Dipl.-Inform. IRB - immer richtig beraten
Rainer Klute EXUG - European X User Group
Universitdt Dortmund, IRB
D-44221 Dortmund Tel.: +49 231 755-4663

<http://www.informatik.uni-dortmund.de/IRB/Klute.html>

Next message: Matt Timmermans/MSL: "Re: SGML wierdness #743 [Was: Toward Closure on HTML ]"
Previous message: Chris Lilley, Computer Graphics Unit: "Re: Fate of <P> [Was: Toward Closure on HTML]"
In reply to: Chris Lilley, Computer Graphics Unit: "Multipart/mixed for many inline images (was Re: Toward Closure on HTML)"
Next in thread: Matt Heffron: "Re: Multipart/mixed for many inline images (was Re: Toward Closure on HTML)"