For more than a year. Will you go Seattle?
> >> So, whether it should be extended or not and how can it be extended
> >> is, I think, the largest issue.
> Let me see. But ISO 639 is resonable for the time. Do you
> think about it?
It depends on applications.
ISO 639 is enough for the coarsest approximation, and can be used
for a while until extension mechanism is developed based on
real needs and experiences, I think.
> >> Do you want to distinguish Queen's and American English?
> It is diffcult for me to make exact distinctions between
> both languages. ;-<
The difference is minor and ISO 639 nor its proposed extension does not
But, UNIX command spell distinguishes them, at least.