Re: HTML+ Comments

Bill Janssen (janssen@parc.xerox.com)
Mon, 19 Jul 1993 15:49:44 PDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Bill Janssen: "Re: Adobe's PDF"
Previous message: Omy Ronquillo: "Printing graphics."
In reply to: Guido.van.Rossum@cwi.nl: "Re: HTML+ Comments"
Next in thread: Marc Andreessen: "Re: HTML+ Comments"

Excerpts from ext.WorldWideWeb: 19-Jul-93 Re: HTML+ Comments
Guido.van.Rossum@cwi.nl (2789)

> Fine, but what happened with HTML-0 compatibility? You leave <IMG> in
> for compatibility, but drop <I> <B> <U> in spite of it. Personally
> I'd really favor being completely backward compatible, since it
> appears that HTML-0 might have a long life of its own, especially once
> canonicalized as an informative RFC.

Yes, please.

Bill

Next message: Bill Janssen: "Re: Adobe's PDF"
Previous message: Omy Ronquillo: "Printing graphics."
In reply to: Guido.van.Rossum@cwi.nl: "Re: HTML+ Comments"
Next in thread: Marc Andreessen: "Re: HTML+ Comments"