Re: WAIS

Martijn Koster (m.koster@nexor.co.uk)
Mon, 19 Jul 1993 16:54:00 +0100


Archie Warnock writes:

> It's efficient because you don't have to retrieve an entire document
> using WAIS - only a URL. If you let the WWW client handle the document
> retrieval from the URL, you always have the documents in context - i.e.,
> you always retrieve from the HTTP server, so things like relative links
> work correctly - they don't if you use WAIS to retrieve the document.
> WAIS handles the searches, so your starting point in the web is a
> document that's relevant to your topic of interest.

I agree completely. I don't want to use WAIS for document retrieval.

> It's easy to implement already, and getting easier.

I am not quite sure what you are referring to here...
implementation of WAIS in a WWW client?

What I am after is the best way an information provider can provide a
searcheable index of web-accesible information into the web.
I want the performance and the algorithm of WAIS, but I don't really want to
have to run a WAIS server, and I'd like to have some HTML control of how the
results are displayed. Have a look at the searches in my Mac Archive to see
an example <http://web.nexor.co.uk/mac-archive/welcome.html>. Another
application would be the UU Meta library.

If you generalise this I want to do WWW searches for keywords in a file
with three fields, like:

title keywords URLs(or any HTML)

and get a list like:

<H1>Results</H1>
<H2>A title</H2>(Score: 1000)
...the HTML, with a pointer to some document...
<H2>Another title</H2>...

This would give a general framework to publish indexes, especially if I
can just run a program on this file, and dump the result somewhere under
a HTTP server that would know what todo with it.

> > Can you not achieve the same thing by having waisindex generate an index
> > of a file with titles, keywords and URL's, and have a command line WAIS
> > client called from the HTTP server, or compiled into the HTTPserver do
> > the lookups? This would eliminate the need for the WAIS protocol, and in
>
> You probably could, but this seems to require less code hacking. It's
> not a hard thing to do - it's a clever thing ;-)

If there is an easy way to do the above I'd love to hear it.

-- Martijn
__________
Internet: m.koster@nexor.co.uk
X-400: C=GB; A=Mark400; P=Nexor; O=Nexor; S=koster; I=M
X-500: c=GB@o=NeXor Ltd@cn=Martijn Koster
WWW: http://web.nexor.co.uk/mak/mak.html