Network Working Group D.W. Dodds RFC # 703 BBN-TENEXA NIC # 32988 11 July, 1975 July, 1975, Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers In the nearly five months since the last report several new server sites have joined the network and there has been some significant progress in New-Protocol implementation. Perhaps the New-Protocol implementation on the TIPs scheduled for the end of the year will encourage further progress in the near future. There have been numerous changes since the last list (numbers in octal): SRI-ARC (2) is no longer a server host; MIT-AI (206), MIT-ML (306), LONDON (52), and OFFICE-1 (53) have added New-Protocol servers; LLL-RISOS (25), SDAC-44 (32), and ARPA-DMS (34) have joined the network; SCI-TENEX (55), Rutgers-10 (56), USC-ISIC (364), and SUMEX-AIM (70) have joined the network with New-Protocol servers. The following is the latest version* of the summary and tabulation of server-host TELNET servers. total server hosts 43 100% no New-Prot server 16 37% unknown status (new host) 2 5% total New-Prot implem. 25 58% New-Prot on 1 and 27, Old on socket 1 (2) 13 30% New-Prot on 1 and 27 (3) 8 19% New-Prot on 1 only (3) 4 9% Notes: * All data in this report were gathered via a surveying program run at various times, plus a few manual checks to fill out the list. What is reported here is the way the various servers work as seen by the new-Protocol User Telnet at BBNA, as of 10 July 1975. (2) These are the sites whose operation is 100% correct according to all protocols and conventions, as I understand them. (3) We realize that some of the servers that appear here as New-Protocol servers on socket 1 are actually servers which attempt to communicate with both Old- and New-Protocol User TELNETs according to what control sequences are received. Dodds [Page 1] RFC 703 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers July 1975 Tabulation of server status for all server sites: Host Number Host Socket Socket New-Prot, Options (Oct) (Dec) Name 1 27 Implementated (if any) 101 65 UCLA-CCN Old X 201 129 UCLA-CCBS Old X 102 66 SRI-AI Old New I1,3,6; O3 3 3 UCSB-MOD75 Old X 4 4 UTAH-10 Old X 305 197 BBN-TENEXA Old New I1,3,6; O3 106 70 MIT-DMS New New I1,3; O3 206 134 MIT-AI New X I1,3; O3 306 198 MIT-ML New X I1,3; O3 7 7 RAND-RCC Old X 107 71 RAND-ISD ? ? 10 8 SDC-LAB Old X 11 9 HARV-10 New X I1,3; O3 12 10 LL-67 New X None 112 74 LL-TX-2 Old X 13 11 SU-AI New* New* I1,3 16 14 CMU-10B New New I1,3; O3 116 78 CMU-10A New New I1,3; O3 17 15 I4-TENEX Old X 217 143 I4B-TENEX Old X 20 16 AMES-67 New New None 25 21 LLL-RISOS Old Old 126 86 USC-ISI Old New I1,3,6; O3 226 150 USC-ISIB Old New I1,3,6; O3 27 23 USC-44 Old X 327 215 USC-ECL Old X 32 26 SDAC-44 Old X 34 28 ARPA-DMS Old X 37 31 CCA-TENEX Old X 40 32 PARC-MAXC Old New I1,3,6; O3 43 35 UCSD-CC Old New I0(!),3; O0,3 344 228 HAWAII-500 Old X 52 42 LONDON New New None 53 43 OFFICE-1 Old New I1,3,6; O3 54 44 MIT-MULTICS New New None 55 45 SCI-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3 56 46 RUTGERS-10 New New I1,3; O3 61 49 BBN-TENEXB Old New I1,3,6; O3 361 241 BBN-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3 162 114 BBN-TENEXD Old New I1,3,6; O3 364 244 USC-ISIC Old New I1,3,6; O3 67 55 ANL ? ? 70 56 SUMEX-AIM Old New I1,3,6; O3 Dodds [Page 2] RFC 703 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers July 1975 Key: X No server at this socket ? Status not ascertained-unable to connect to host I# Option # implemented incoming to user (Server says "Will #") O# Option # implemented outgoing from user (Server says "Do #") (# is option number in new Protocol, Options in tabulation: 0 Transmit-Binary 1 Echo 3 Suppress-Go-Ahead 6 Timing-Mark) Note: * These servers return improper responses to some TELNET option requests. [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ] [ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 11/99 ] Dodds [Page 3] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Network Working Group D.W. Dodds Request for Comments: 669 BBN-TENEXA NIC: 31435 December 4, 1974 November, 1974, Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers Two months have elapsed since our last survey, and the appearance of additional New-Protocol servers has progressed at the usual snail's pace. The changes in this list are (with host numbers in octal): SRI-AI (102) now has a New-Protocol server; SDC-LAB (10) is back on the net and the list; SDC-CC (110) is coming on the net but status is as yet unknown; USC-ISI (126) and USC-ISIB (226) (formerly ISI-DEVTENEX) now have New-Protocol servers; SDAC-44 (32) has been removed -- no longer classed as a server host; HAWAII-500 (344) is coming on the net, status presently unknown; LONDON (52) has been added; BBN-TENEXD is now host 162 (formerly 205). What follows is an update of the summary and tabulation that appeared in RFC #702.* Is there light at the end of the tunnel? total server hosts 37 100% no New-Prot server 19 51% unknown status (new host) 2 6% total New-Prot implem. 16 43% New-Prot on socket 27, Old on socket 1 (2) 9 24% New-Prot on 1 and 27 (3) 6 16% New-Prot on 1 only (3) 1 3% Notes: * All data in this report were gathered via a surveying program run at various times, plus a few manual checks to fill out the data. What is reported here is the way the various servers work as seen by the new-Protocol User Telnet at BBNA, as of 4 Dec. 1974. (2) These are the sites whose operation is 100% correct according to all protocols and conventions, as I understand them. (3) We realize that some of the servers that appear here as New- Protocol servers on socket 1 are actually servers which attempt to communicate with both Old- and New-Protocol User TELNETs according to what control sequences are received. Dodds [Page 1] RFC 669 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers December 1974 Tabulation of server status for all server sites: Host Host Socket Socket New-Prot, Options No. Name 1 27 Implementation (if any) 101 UCLA-CCN Old X 201 UCLA-CCBS Old X 2 SRI-ARC Old X 102 SRI-AI Old New I1,3,6; O3 3 UCSB-MOD75 Old X 4 UTAH-10 Old X 105 BBN-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3 305 BBN-TENEXA Old New I1,3,6; O3 106 MIT-DMS New New I1,3; O3 206 MIT-AI Old X 306 MIT-ML Old X 7 RAND-RCC Old X 10 SDC-LAB Old X 110 SDC-CC ? ? 11 HARV-10 New X I1,3; O3 12 LL-67 Old* X 112 LL-TX-2 Old X 13 SU-AI New* New* I1,3 15 CASE-10 Old X 16 CMU-10B New New I1,3; O3 116 CMU-10A New New I1,3; O3 17 I4-TENEX Old X 217 KI4B-TENEX Old X 20 AMES-67 New New None 126 USC-ISI Old New I1,3,6; O3 226 USC-ISIB Old New I1,3,6; O3 27 USC-44 Old X 327 USC-ECL Old X 37 CCA-TENEX Old X 40 PARC-MAXC Old New I1,3,6; O3 43 UCSD-CC Old New I0(!),3; O0,3 344 HAWAII-500 ? ? 52 LONDON Old* X 53 OFFICE-1 Old X 54 MIT-MULTICS New New None 61 BBN-TENEXB Old New I1,3,6; O3 162 BBN-TENEXD Old New I1,3,6; O3 Dodds [Page 2] RFC 669 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers December 1974 Key: X No server at this socket ? Status not ascertained -- unable to connect to host I# Option # implemented incoming to user (Server says "Will #") O# Option # implemented outgoing from user (Server says "Do #") (# is option number in new Protocol. All options implemented by anyone are: 0 Transmit-Binary 1 Echo 3 Suppress-Go-Ahead 6 Timing-Mark ) Note: * These servers return improper responses to some TELNET option requests. [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ] [ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 2/2000 ] Dodds [Page 3] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Network Working Group D.W. Dodds RFC # 702 BBN-TENEXA September 25, 1974 SEPTEMBER, 1974, SURVEY OF NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET SERVERS LAST MONTH'S SURVEY PRODUCED A GRATIFYING AMOUNT OF FEEDBACK CLARIFYING THE STATUS OF SEVERAL SITES; HOWEVER THERE HAVE BEEN VERY FEW CHANGES IN THE STATUS OF HOST SERVERS. THE CHANGES IN THIS MONTH'S LIST, IN NUMERICAL ORDER (HOST NUMBER THROUGHOUT ARE OCTAL): UCLA-NMC IS NO LONGER A SERVER; HOST 205 IS NOW BBN-TENEXD, A NEW SYSTEM (BBNB) IS NOW HOST 61; RAND-RCC WAS ACCIDENTALLY OMITTED FROM THE PREVIOUS LIST; SDC-LAB HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY ELIMINATED FROM THE LIST UNTIL IT RETURNS TO THE NET; I4-TENEXA (117) IS NOT A SERVER--KI4B-TENEX (217) IS, AND HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE LIST; AMES-67 FIXED A BUG, REVEALING TO THE WORLD THE NEW-PROTOCOL SERVER (NO OPTIONS) THAT WAS THERE ALL ALONG; ISI-DEVTENEX (226) AND USC-ECL (327) HAVE BEEN ADDED. WHAT FOLLOWS IS AN UPDATE OF THE SUMMARY AND TABULATION THAT APPEARED LAST MONTH.* THERE IS STILL A LONG WAY TO GO TO 100% NEW-PROTOCOL IMPLEMENTATION. TOTAL SERVER HOSTS 34 100% NO NEW-PROT SERVER 21 62% TOTAL NEW-PROT IMPLEM. 13 38% NEW-PROT ON SOCKET 27, OLD ON SOCKET 1 (2) 6 18% NEW-PROT ON 1 AND 27 (3) 6 18% NEW-PROT ON 1 ONLY 1 3% NOTES: * ALL DATA IN THIS REPORT WERE GATHERED VIA A SURVEYING PROGRAM RUN AT VARIOUS TIMES, PLUS A FEW MANUAL CHECKS TO FILL OUT THE DATA. WHAT IS REPORTED HERE IS THE WAY THE VARIOUS SERVERS WORK AS SEEN BY THE NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNET AT BBNA, AS OF 23 SEPT. 1974. (2) THESE ARE THE SITES WHOSE OPERATION IS 100% CORRECT ACCORDING TO ALL PROTOCOL AND CONVENTIONS, AS I UNDERSTAND THEM. (3) WE REALIZE THAT SOME OF THE SERVERS THAT APPEAR HERE AS NEW-PROTOCOL SERVERS ON SOCKET 1 ARE ACTUALLY SERVERS WHICH ATTEMPT TO COMMUNICATE WITH BOTH OLD- AND NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNETS ACCORDING TO WHAT CONTROL SEQUENCES ARE RECEIVED. Dodds [Page 1] RFC 702 SURVEY OF NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET SERVERS September 1974 TABULATION OF SERVER STATUS FOR ALL SERVER SITES: HOST HOST SOCKET SOCKET NEW-PROT, OPTIONS NO. NAME 1 27 IMPLETMENTED(IF ANY) 101 UCLA-CCN OLD X 201 UCLA-CCBS OLD X 2 SRI-ARC OLD X 102 SRI-AI OLD X 3 UCSB-MOD75 OLD X 4 UTAH-10 OLD X 105 BBN-TENEX OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3 205 BBN TENEXD OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3 305 BBN-TENEXA OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3 106 MIT-DMS NEW NEW I1, 3; O3 206 MIT-AI OLD X 306 MIT-ML OLD X 7 RAND-RCC OLD X 11 HARV-10 NEW X I1, 3; O3 12 LL-67 OLD X 112 LL-TX-2 OLD X 13 SU-AI NEW* NEW* I1, 3 15 CASE-10 OLD X 16 CMU-10B NEW NEW I1, 3; O3 116 CMU-10A NEW NEW I1, 3; O3 17 I4-TENEX OLD X 217 KI4B-TENEX OLD X 20 AMES-67 NEW NEW NONE 126 USC-ISI OLD X 226 ISI-DEVTENEX OLD X 27 USC-44 OLD X 327 USC-ECL OLD X 32 SDAC-44 OLD X 37 CCA-TENEX OLD X 40 PARC-MAXC OLD NEW I1,3,6; O3 43 UCSD-CC OLD NEW I0(!), 3; O0, 3 53 OFFICE-1 OLD X 54 MIT-MULTICS NEW NEW NONE 61 BBN-TENEXB OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3 Dodds [Page 2] RFC 702 SURVEY OF NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET SERVERS September 1974 KEY TO SERVER STATUS TABLE: X NO SERVER AT THIS SOCKET I# OPTION # IMPLEMENTED INCOMING TO USER (SERVER SAYS "WILL #") O# OPTION # IMPLEMENTED OUTGOING FROM USER (SERVER SAYS "DO #") (# IS OPTION NUMBER IN NEW PROTOCOL. ALL OPTIONS IMPLEMENTED BY ANYONE ARE: 0 TRANSMIT-BINARY 1 ECHO 3 SUPPRESS-GO-AHEAD 6 TIMING-MARK) NOTE: * THERE APPEARS TO BE A MINOR BUG IN SU-AI'S SERVER: IT SEEMS TO SEND AN IMPROPER RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR OPTION 0. [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ] [ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 11/99 ] Dodds [Page 3] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ AUGUST, 1974 AUGUST, 1974, SURVEY OF NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET SERVERS THIS IS THE FIRST OF WHAT ARE PLANNED TO BE MONTHLY REPORTS ON THE STATUS OF THE NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET IMPLEMENTAIONS ON THE SERVER HOSTS ON THE ARPA NETWORK. INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT ARE DATA ONLY ON SERVER TELNETS AT THE VARIOUS SITES. ONE WOULD HOPE THAT ANY SITE WITH AN OPERATIONAL NEW-PROTOCOL SERVER TELNET WOULD ALSO BOAST A NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNET; WE CAN CERTAINLY ASSUME THIS FOR TENEX SITES AT WHICH TENEX 1.32 IS OPERATING. HOWEVER, NO FURTHER CLAIMS ARE MADE FOR THE SERVER DATA CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT. I AM SORRY TO REPORT THAT AT THIS LATE DATE, A MONTH AFTER THE RELEASE OF TENEX 1.32, LESS THAN ONE-THIRD OF THE SERVER SITES HAVE ANY NEW- PROTOCOL SERVER OPERATING, ACCORDING TO MY SURVEYS*, AND ONLY HALF OF THOSE ARE USING CORRECTLY THE LOGGER SOCKET CONVENTIONS, AS I UNDERSTAND THEM. AT THE END OF THIS REPORT IS A COMPLETE TABULATION COMPILED FROM MY SURVEYS; THE FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY: TOTAL SERVER HOSTS 32 100% STATUS UNKNOWN (1) 3 9% NO NEW-PROT SERVER 19 59% TOTAL NEW-PROT IMPLEM. 10 31% NEW-PROT ON SOCKET 27, OLD ON SOCKET 1 (2) 5 16% NEW-PROT ON 1 AND 27 (3) 4 13% NEW-PROT ON 1 ONLY (3) 1 3% NOTES: * ALL DATA IN THIS REPORT WERE GATHERED VIA A SURVEYING PROGRAM RUN AT VARIOUS TIMES, PLUS A FEW MANUAL CHECKS TO FILL OUT THE DATA. WHAT IS REPORTED HERE IS THE WAY THE VARIOUS SERVERS WORK AS SEEN BY THE NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNET AT BBNA, AS OF 15 AUG. 1974. THERE MAY BE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THESE RESULTS AND THOSE FROM SURVEYS MADE AT OTHER SITES. (1) NUMEROUS ATTEMPTS TO CONNECT TO THESE SITES ALL FAILED DUE TO THE SITES' BEING DOWN TO THE NETWORK. (2) THESE ARE THE SITES WHOSE OPERATION IS 100% CORRECT ACCORDING TO ALL PROTOCOLS AND CONVENTIONS, AS I UNDERSTAND THEM. (3) WE REALIZE THAT SOME OF THE SERVERS THAT APPEAR HERE AS NEW- PROTOCOL SERVERS ON SOCKET 1 ARE ACTUALLY SERVERS WHICH ATTEMPT TO COMMUNICATE WITH BOTH OLD- AND NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNETS ACCORDING TO WHAT CONTROL SEQUENCES ARE RECEIVED. TABULATION OF SERVER STATUS FOR ALL SERVER SITES: HOST HOST SOCKET SOCKET NEW-PROT. OPTIONS NO. NAME 1 27 IMPLEMENTATED (IF ANY) 1 UCLA-NMC ? ? 101 UCLA-CCN OLD X 201 UCLA-CCBC OLD X 2 SRI-ARC OLD X 102 SRI-AI OLD X 3 UCSB-MOD75 OLD X 4 UTAH-10 OLD X 105 BBN-TENEX OLD NEW I1,3,6; 03 205 BBN-TENEXB OLD NEW I1,3,6; 03 305 BBN-TENEXA OLD NEW I1,3,6; 03 106 MIT-DMS NEW NEW I1,3; 03 206 MIT-AI OLD X 306 MIT-ML OLD X 10 SDC-LAB ? ? 11 HARV-10 NEW X I1,3; 03 12 LL-67 OLD X 112 LL-TX-2 OLD X 13 SU-AI NEW* NEW* I1,3 15 CASE-10 OLD X 16 CMU-10B NEW NEW I1,3; 03 116 CMU-10A NEW NEW I1,3; 03 17 I4-TENEX OLD X 117 I4-TENEXA ? ? 20 AMES-67 OLD OLD(1) 126 USC-ISI OLD X 27 USC-44 OLD X 32 SDAC OLD X 37 CCA-TENEX OLD X 40 PARC-MAXC OLD NEW I1,3,6; 03 43 UCSD-CC OLD NEW IO(1),3; 00,3 53 OFFICE-1 OLD X 54 MIT-MULTICS NEW NEW NONE KEY: X NO SEVER AT THIS SOCKET ? STATUS UNKNOWN I# OPTION # IMPLEMENTED INCOMING TO USER (SERVER SAYS "WILL #") O# OPTION # IMPLEMENTED OUTGOING FROM USER (SERVER SAYS "DO #") (# IS OPTION NUMBER IN NEW PROTOCOL. ALL OPTIONS IMPLEMENTED BY ANYONE ARE: 0 TRANSMIT-BINARY 1 ECHO 3 SUPRESS-GO-AHEAD 6 TIMING MARK ) NOTE: * THERE APPEARS TO BE A MINOR BUG IN SU-AI'S SERVER: IT SEEMS TO SEND AN IMPROPER RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR OPTION O. SUBMITTED 20 AUGUST 1974 BY D. W. DODDS